The
Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area met for their regular meeting yesterday at
First Presbyterian Church in Stillwater.
I arrived early to set up a table to share information about Chain of
Lakes Church, a ministry of the Presbytery.
I
also came early to attend a Pre-Presbytery event on terms of settlement for
congregations seeking to depart from the PC(USA). The Administrative Commission (A.C) that is
working with Hope Church in Richfield was making a report and seeking input
from the Presbytery. Hope Church has
requested to be dismissed from the PC(USA).
Representatives
from the A.C. shared the following information.
·
Their
conversations with appointed leaders from Hope have been filled with grace—not at
all acrimonious. Hope has supplied all the information that has
been asked of them.
·
The
A.C. has discerned that people from Hope want to leave the PC(USA). An on-line, confidential survey was conducted
that led the A.C. to this conclusion.
·
The
A.C. is now entering the negotiation phase on terms of settlement. They are hoping to present a settlement to be
voted on at the November Presbytery meeting.
After
each person from the A.C. shared a report everyone present was allowed to share
thoughts on what should be part of the settlement. Opinions varied from dismissing the church
with the Presbytery’s blessing to asking for a financial settlement of various
sizes.
The
conversation was painful. This is a
divorce. Who enjoys a divorce? What is also painful is that four additional
churches have requested to leave, so this process could be repeated four more
times.
I
have expressed in the past and I still believe that churches who leave should
give a financial gift to the Presbytery based on some percentage of their
property. If Chain of Lakes were to
leave the Presbytery in the future (which will never happen) people would
expect us to share some if not all of the gift of property that we were
given. I wish that Presbyterian churches
weren’t connected by property, but this is how the PC(USA) is set up. It doesn’t seem right to change the rules in
the middle of the game.
After
that Pre-Presbytery I went to my table to talk to people. I missed a sizable chunk of the meeting. I came back when the Presbytery was voting to
receive a first report on changing the structure of the Council.
It
was wonderful to hear the excitement of Ministry in a Changing World. This initiative has helped many congregations
deepen their sense of mission. Yay, God!
The
Finance Work Group brought a proposal asking for approval to move the
Presbytery offices and to eliminate Dennis Sanders’ position, who is responsible
for communications out of the Presbytery office. I was pleased to hear many people question
the elimination of this position. Dennis
has done an excellent job of using new media to communicate information from
the Presbytery. Everyone recognized that
buying some web services from an outside company wouldn’t cut it. The Presbytery voted to move the offices and
table the recommendation on the Communications position.
I’m
sure the Budget Task Force is going to wonder how they are going to fill that
gap. The Presbytery is facing a large
gap in their budget for 2014. I have a
vested interest in this process being the Organizing Pastor for a new church
who receives money from the Presbytery. That
money is critical for the future success of Chain of Lakes. The biggest threat that our new church has to
our future is a cut in resources from the Presbytery. A cut could negate the growth that our new
congregation has recently experienced.
I
don’t believe the Presbytery can achieve a balanced budget only by cutting
their budget. Churches and individuals
must give more—preferably their giving would be voluntary and not
mandatory. I hope everyone who spoke
against the cutting of the communications position is willing to ask their own
congregations to double or even triple their General Mission pledge to
Presbytery. I’ve volunteered to go out
in the past to speak to churches about Chain of Lakes Church and encourage
churches to give to General Mission. I’m
still willing to do that.
The
Presbytery has multiple issues on its plate right now—more than I can ever
remember in the 20 years since I’ve been a member of the Presbytery. We need to rally around a vision of who we
are, and we all need to acknowledge that we can’t get through these issues
without significant shared sacrifice.
1 comment:
Thank you for your faithful observations, Paul.
Post a Comment